Sample identity
State how the bottle connects to the asset, sample point, custody record and any collection exception.
Quality criteria / transparent routing
Before a sample moves, the receiving location, method, applicable quality status, QC approach and reviewer should be clear.
Before collection
VeriFluid will document what is known for the requested work before collection. If a status or route is still being confirmed, it should be stated as such. No blanket accreditation or manufacturer approval is implied.
State how the bottle connects to the asset, sample point, custody record and any collection exception.
Confirm the current procedure, fluid applicability, reporting limit and any method modification.
Identify the calibration and QC checks that apply to the quoted method.
State who reviews the result, interpretation, uncertainty and need for escalation.
Disclose where each test is performed and the quality status that applies there.
Keep measured values, units, normalized fields and interpretation clearly separated.
Software and review
Where software is used, it can normalize units, apply configured checks, find changes and prioritize cases. It should not overwrite the reported instrument result or release an interpretation without human review.
Keep the reported result and sample identity separate from later interpretation.
Make units, naming and baseline references comparable without hiding the source value.
Use configured checks and trend tools to flag results that need attention.
Have a named technical reviewer own the interpretation and release decision.
Qualification status
Manufacturer participation, ISO/IEC 17025 accreditation and method-scope claims should be supported by the applicable written authorization, certificate and published scope.
If a method is routed to another laboratory, that route and its applicable quality status should be stated before collection. References to Dow or DOWFROST™ describe product context only.
Laboratory intake / Asia